Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald review, cast, box office collection

Finally, we have seen what should be the year’s biggest release – Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald. Its the sequel to the amazing Fantastic Beasts and where to find them, and both of these are prequel to the Harry Potter series. Read along Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald review, cast, and box office collection.

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald Review

We’d been anxiously anticipating “Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald.” There are a few enthusiasts of the “Harry Potter” series who weren’t wowed by 2016’s “Fantastic Beasts.” We weren’t one of them. We revered the film and thought it was something that fit this world yet at the same time figured out how to remain one of a kind.

Certainly, Johnny Depp’s appearance as Gellert Grindelwald was somewhat dreary, however the film still swept us away. The beasts weren’t simply awesome, they were beautiful and extraordinary. The cast, with Eddie Redmayne as the lead, was colorful and amusing. The film worked on such a large number of levels that I really wanted to be eager for the sequel.

It sincerely torments me to state this, however the film wasn’t good. I read a story in Entertainment Weekly in which one of the cast individuals says the studio’s creative team thought they needed to improve their game and truly reevaluate the wheel for the sequel. Indeed, they unquestionably rehashed that wheel, and we hope they copyrighted it, so nobody can make such a bad movie again.

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald Story

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald review, cast, box office collection

Each lead female character in this film is assigned to broody love interest. There’s Claudia Kim, who plays Nagini (something for you Harry Potter fans), whose only character qualities are that she can transform into a snake and goes where Credence goes. There’s additionally Tina, who trusts Newt is engaged and has turned into a grouchy love interest. (Truly, she doesn’t do a whole lot in the film, however her testiness toward Newt being off the market is raised on numerous occasions.) And at long last, there’s Queenie, who’s only a girl who needs to be loved and will cast a love spell if that is the thing that it takes to get it going. Alison Sudol’s character is butchered in this film. It would be a spoiler to disclose to you what occurs, yet know that the character’s whole storyline in this film is stupid.

The beasts are still magnificent, but aren’t used as in the first film. In which Newts critters were a very important plot, in this they are used for mere commercial and merchandizing for the film. En route, the film additionally pays homage to the world it’s made from. Hogwarts is appeared in the entirety of its grandness, and I’d lie if that didn’t give me somewhat of a thrill.


Lastly, there’s Leta. The Lestrange family additionally is a main piece of the Harry Potter world. Leta is utilized as an impetus to move further the male storylines in the film. She’s engaged to Theseus however pines after Newt the whole time. Credence considers himself to be a lost Lestrange heir, and she holds the key to truth. She has some pleasant moments, yet for the most part, Leta’s only there to have an influence in another person’s story.

The first movie introduced this wonderful world that Newt and his friends lived in. The characters were developed, and we found out about them as the film advanced. All that character development is lost here. Tina has moved from being a character who simply needed to do a good job to a love interest that doesn’t feel like she has any inspiration for her activities or bigger purpose. Queenie is pretty much unrecognizable.

Jacob’s lost his amazement and innocence and incessant comic-relief. Indeed, even Newt is dull.


In summary, “The Crimes of Grindelwald” is dull and needs to persuade you it is more unpredictable than its antecedent. It’s definitely not. Just poorly made on about each level. It’s additionally loaded up with plot twists and big moments as opposed to character improvement and different indications of craftsmanship. Its really lacking in amusement, but the beasts are amazing you can watch it if you like. But I would wait for the Blu-ray and watch the uncut version. Even Redmayne said he was confused on the main cut of the film.

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald Box office collection

The $62 million domestic opening this weekend was 16% below the $74 million opening of the first Fantastic Beasts two years ago. The better news is that domestic plus international combined for a $253 million bow, compared to $218 million for its predecessor. 

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald Cast

  • Eddie Redmayne as Lewt Scamander
  • Katherine Waterson as Tina Goldstein
  • Dan Fogler as Jacob Kowalski
  • Johnny Depp as Grindelwald
  • Jude Law as Albus Dumbledore
  • Alison Sudol as Queenie Goldstein
  • Ezra Miller as Credence Barebone
  • Zoe Kravits as Leta Lestrange
  • Callum Turner as Theseus Scamander

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *